What free trade could mean for the United States and Cuba.
Launched with the Eisenhower administration’s cancellation of Cuban sugar quotas in the summer of 1960, the U.S. embargo on Cuba has been ratcheted up over five decades to include nearly full bans on trade, investment, travel, and small financial transfers.
Having lasted for 64 of the 112 years since Cuba’s independence in 1902, the embargo policy is now older than 9 million of Cuba’s 11.3 million people.
The Obama administration’s December shift in course involves some scaling back of sanctions – credit card and financial links, telecom business, travel – and, on the grounds that “American businesses should not be put at a disadvantage, and increased commerce is good for Americans and for Cubans,” a call for Congress to consider “an honest and serious debate about lifting the embargo.”
What would this mean? The consequences for politics within Cuba, family relationships, and so forth are of course unknowable. But in the limited world of trade flows, here are three non-scientific measuring sticks for the potential scale:
1. Top estimate, from comparisons with the pre-Castro era: In 1955, the $455 million worth of goods Cubans bought from the United States – including some cars still running today – accounted for 3 percent of America’s $15.5 billion total exports.
This placed Cuba 8th as an American export market, below Canada, the U.K., Mexico, Japan, Germany, Venezuela, and the Netherlands, but above France, Italy, Brazil, and Korea.
“The U.S. embargo on Cuba is older than 9 million of the 11.3 million Cubans. ”
Conclusion: Given some noticeable changes in the trading world since the 1950s – end of the embargo on China, creation of the European Union, etc. – Cuba probably isn’t likely to regain its 1950s-era share of U.S. commerce at roughly 3 percent of U.S. imports and exports.
If it did, though, with the annual U.S. merchandise trade levels now about $3 trillion, two-way goods trade would be $100 billion or so, probably with some U.S. surplus. This would place Cuba in the neighborhood of the United Kingdom and Korea, and a bit above Saudi Arabia and Brazil.
2. Low estimate, from current levels of Cuban trade and analogies with other Caribbean islands: Cuban imports in 2013 were about $15.8 billion, and exports $5.8 billion. The $21.6 billion total is standard for the larger Caribbean islands: the Dominican Republic is at $27 billion, Trinidad $25 billion, Jamaica $8 billion, and Haiti $4.6 billion. The U.S. supplies about 28 percent of Trinidadian imports, 35 percent for Haiti, and 40 percent for Jamaica, Haiti, and the Dominican Republic.
Conclusion: At current levels of Cuban trade, and assuming the U.S. share might be similar to the shares for Jamaica, Trinidad, Haiti, and the D.R., U.S. exports to Cuba might be $6 billion or so, and imports $4 billion.
“ Cuba probably isn’t likely to regain its 1950s-era share of U.S. commerce. ”
- refusing to permit financing of exports
- barring ships carrying goods to Cuba from leaving port without payment in advance.
This cut exports to $350 million a year after 2008, about the same as farm sales to Jamaica and Haiti, and a bit above the sales to Nicaragua. The U.S. International Trade Commission, looking at these numbers in 2090, guessed at a likely potential U.S. farm export total of $1.2 billion.
Conclusion: Agriculture is about 8 percent of all U.S. exports worldwide. If this ratio holds for Cuba, with farm goods at $1.2 billion, total goods exports would be around $15 billion, comparable with Chile, Israel, and Italy and above Russia.
* Note: The U.K. would rank much higher, about $210 billion, with services trade counted in. We haven’t included services in this fact, not out of laziness or a desire to down-rate Britain, but to preserve like-to-like comparisons – no services trade by country figures, for Cuba or otherwise, are available for the 1950s.
This article first appeared in the Progressive Economy Trade Fact of the Week newsletter and was republished with permission.