Understanding Sustainability and E-Commerce Packaging

Quantifying the true cost of damage and impact can lead to truly sustainable outcomes.

A few years ago, on my way to the office, I was listening to a radio story about the quarterly earnings of a major U.S. retailer. In the story, losses from damaged goods were lumped in the same financial earnings/loss bucket as retail shrinkage and theft.

Pullquote share icon. Share

It’s the “cost of doing business,” many companies say.

This type of financial reporting is not surprising, as it has long been true that there’s a certain amount of damage loss companies find acceptable.

It can be anywhere from 2 to 8 percent, but every business in every industry manages to find its own “acceptable” damage rate.

The Damage Drain: Permissible or Preventable?

Companies use a host of tools and processes to keep damage rates at an acceptable level such as quality control checks and returns tracking reports. They keep an eye out for spikes that indicate a problem, and the rest of the damage is just written off as a loss. It’s the “cost of doing business,” many companies say.

At Sealed Air, we’re in the business of protective packaging. We invented Bubble Wrap® 60 years ago and have been solving the problem of preventing damaged goods ever since.

We believe companies shouldn’t consider any damage rate as acceptable. Damage reduction can and should be improved in order to retain customers and minimize costly returns.

But preventing damage during shipments isn’t just a better business decision, it’s a sustainability imperative. The problem is almost no one is looking at it as one.

More often than not, if and when a retailer decides to look for sustainability gains inside the shipping cycle, they’re almost always looking at the recyclability of the packaging. They’re only concentrating on actions such as swapping plastic air pillows for materials that can be tossed directly into recycling bins.

Pullquote share icon. Share

Preventing damage during shipments isn’t just a better business decision, it’s a sustainability imperative.

But here’s the thing, manufacturing and disposing of the packaging materials accounts for just 5 percent of the environmental impact of the shipping. So even if a retailer discovered a packaging material that was “carbon neutral” and was recycled 100 percent of the time (just because a material is recyclable doesn’t mean it’s recycled) at best, they would only improve the environmental footprint of its shipping cycle by 5 percent.

Forty-eight percent (almost half of the total environmental cost of shipping) comes from damage, and that’s assuming a damage rate of just 1 percent, which most would deem outstanding.

Even with a 1 percent damage rate, the impact of that damage still represents 48 percent of the environmental impact associated with shipping.

If you’re a retailer looking at the fulfillment process as a place to reduce environmental impact where should you start? In the 5 percent impact of interior packaging materials? Or would you work on getting the damage rate below 1 percent? Would you stop thinking one percent is acceptable?

Yes, materials that are easily disposable matter. And the sustainability values of a company are clearly conveyed by the materials used to deliver goods. These are conversations we must continue to have and solutions we must continue to innovate.

Beyond the Recycle Bin: Getting Consumers to See the Bigger Picture    

But those of us who have expertise in the challenges of the fulfillment journey also have a duty to educate consumers on why certain packaging materials are chosen over others.

The true sustainability impact doesn’t come from whether or not it’s made of recycled material or if it can be recycled curbside, it lies in the ability to eliminate the risk of damage and eliminate the risk of that item doubling, tripling or even quadrupling its environmental footprint.

Being “recyclable” isn’t a silver bullet. We aren’t going to be able to recycle our way out of the environmental problems that e-commerce creates.

Making more products recyclable is a big step, but those solutions should also require less energy to produce, fewer trucks for transport, less fuel for the trucks and more recyclability at end of life.

This is a complex issue, and at a time when there is enormous (and justified) consumer pressure on plastics, it is a nuanced conversation to have with businesses and consumers alike.

Sealed Air’s goal as a fulfillment expert is to help brands, retailers and consumers understand that ensuring an item is delivered undamaged, using materials that were sourced, created and applied using the least amount of waste and energy is what will lead to truly sustainable outcomes.

This article originally appeared on the Sealed Air blog and was republished with permission.

Dan Healey is the Director of Sustainability for Sealed Air’s Product Care division where he leads efforts to expand, quantify and communicate the substantial environmental benefits that come from preventing product damage and reducing material waste across the fulfillment supply chain.

Click the RSS icon to subscribe to future articles by this author. RSS Feed